Showing posts with label 1850s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1850s. Show all posts

24 January 2026

1855 The Grand Crimean Central Railway

The Crimean War (1853-1856) was 'a notoriously incompetent international butchery'.


Who did this?

The leaders in charge were:  


  • Queen Victoria (1819-1901) of Great Britain
  • Prime Ministers:
    • Lord Aberdeen in office 1852-1855
    • Viscount Palmerston in office 1855-1858
  • Emperor Napoleon III (1808-1873) of the Second French Empire
  • Abdul Mejid I (1823-1861) Sultan of the Ottoman Empire

                                        versus

  • Czar Nicholas I (1796-1855) of the Russian Empire.

Both Napoleon and Abdul Mejid could have been considered reformers as they tried to make conditions and institutions in their countries better. 

'Nicholas the Stick' was kind of rigid and doctrinaire about everything.


Empire Building

The general extent of Britain's empire during the Victorian Era is well-known to most. 

Napoleon wanted France to have a greater world influence as he worked to obtain colonies in places like Algeria and Indochina. 

The Czar had been tempted for some time by the weakness of the Ottoman Empire 'the sick man of Europe' ... not much of a tourism slogan. To create a provocation, he told the Ottoman Empire to let him look after the Christians within the Ottoman Empire. Nick the Stick wanted to set up Russian circles of power and influence within the weakening Ottoman areas, particularly in Wallachia and Moldavia.

... Russia subsequently moved into those two areas and the Ottoman Empire declared war. To demonstrate their enthusiasm, Russia sent a naval force to sink the smaller Ottoman fleet at Sinope - resulting in the deaths of about 3000 Turks in November 1853, and then they shelled the place for a week.

Wanting to keep the Russian Empire in check, particularly on the high seas, France and Britain declared war on Russia a few months later ... and about 6 months later they showed up with armies to demonstrate their sincerity about the whole business.

The British military started in September 1854 to bring in a force of 26,000 soldiers ... reaching 98,000 in 1855.

The French started with 30,000 ... peaking at 310,000 in 1855.


from: Penguin Atlas of Recent History; Colin McEvedy; 1982; Penguin.

The map below spans events over a few decades. From all the green arrows, you can see that the Russian Empire was broadening its horizons. One additional reason for their interest in the Black Sea and the Dardanelle Straits leading to the Mediterranean Sea ... was a desire to gain access to a variety of harbours which were not impaired by ice for part of the year.

The Russian navy had an excellent natural harbour at Sebastopol on the Crimean Peninsula. This is correctly 'Sevastopol' as there were longstanding historical errors in transposing one letter from the Cyrillic to the Latin alphabet. 

At any rate, most of the action will centre on that location.

from: Atlas of World History Vol 2; Kinder, Hilgemann; 1978; Penguin.

*  *  *

from: Google Maps circa 2016.

Above: The general morphology of Balaklava harbour might remind one of a smaller, dryer version of St John's Newfoundland - complete with a 'telegraph' tower. And if you are familiar with historical St John's, you know where to put the railway. 

*  *  *

from: Google Maps.

Here is the current view of Sebastopol's excellent natural harbour. You can see the source of the historic B/V Sebastopol letter transposing error. According to Wiki, this was a closed city during the days of the USSR and the Cold War, as there were all sorts of interesting military activities to be seen here.

*  *  *

from: The Seat of War in the East; Simpson; 1855,1902; Day & Son. archive.org

A number of Crimean War events are being skipped for 'brevity'. 

Above is the main British harbour used to receive the provisions and weapons for the siege of Sebastopol. The French had other arrangements (map below). Notice that sail is still primarily the means of propulsion for ships. However, many ships are shown with supplementary steam engines which could be used when the winds were not favourable. 

The British showed up in the summer of 1854, probably with their classic expectation that the whole affair would be over by Christmas. 

It wasn't. And the British were not ready for winter. It had been a few decades since they had fought a war. They had kept themselves beautiful, with an emphasis on immaculate uniforms and parade square precision. 

However, their logistics and supply chains did not work, did not exist. There were no warm clothes, no shelter, no food, few draft animals, no fodder for draft animals, no medical care to speak of. Water-borne and other diseases, starvation and death were present in abundance for the poorly supported British soldiers in Crimea.

Fortunately, this was the first British foreign war with a correspondent working for a homeland newspaper - William Howard Russell (1827-1907). And he would soon have access to a telegraph wire. Officials began to feel the heat for this fiasco. 

Indeed, as you will already know, in November 1854 Florence Nightingale arrived and eventually revolutionized the existing military health care system. But she worked in Scutari, near Constantinople - over 300 miles away. Far more soldiers would die from disease, poor sanitation, and lack of food than were killed in fighting in Crimea. 

British Army Deaths 1854-1856. Combat 2755; Wounds 1847; Disease 17,580.

New Technology for the Crimean War

We've already noted the steam power at sea. This included some fast, powerful steamships.

The rifle and ball/'bullet' invented by Claude-Étienne Minié in 1849 saw their first service with the British here. Instead of a ball rattling down a smooth musket barrel, the muzzle-loading Minié rifle used a 'ball' (designed in a bullet shape but with no enclosed powder, etc) with a concave base which deformed on firing to capture all of the thrust imparted by the exploding gunpowder. A little rifling near the muzzle gave this projectile the spin necessary to achieve much greater accuracy. This high-velocity 'bullet' was much more effective than an old musket ball in its ability to smash bones and cause large wounds which were often fatal - particularly in Crimea.

The undersea telegraph wire, and exploding artillery shells on land and for naval guns, were also 'new' in this military effort. 

The Crimean 'trench warfare' pre-dated that of the US Civil War ...

With explosive shells and rifled muskets making life very dangerous for soldiers in the open, living in a trench was essential to limit casualties. 


from: The Seat of War in the East; Simpson; 1855,1902; Day & Son. archive.org

The careless mistakes leading to the infamous Charge of the Light Brigade occurred on 25 October 1854. The Woronzoff Road (below) was lost to the Russians by the British as a result of battlefield errors. Its loss meant that supplies for the camps overlooking Sebastopol were hauled through mud. 

As winter approached, the British managed to kill off almost all of the indigenous draft animals they found from overwork - as they dragged wagons through the mud. As we discussed, there was no fodder for them. Energy-dense grains and periods of rest are required to sustain animals working this hard. The artist has emphasized the ribs of the animals in the image.

from: The War in Crimea; Hamley; 1910; Seeley. archive.org

One More New Technology

The following names may sound familiar ... 

Thanks to that unwanted war correspondent, railway contractor Samuel Peto found out about the Crimean logistical mess and he rounded up fellow railroaders Edward Betts and Thomas Brassey. Peto had an idea to resolve the military's transportation problems in Crimea. 

We all know what a great invention the self-steering, low-friction railway was ... because it enabled long processions of heavy loads to be carried over all types of difficult terrain. For example, in Canada.

With support from the Secretary of State for War, Peto and his colleagues organized and sent steamships out with 500 experienced railway-building personnel - including 250 railway navvies - in December 1854. They were fully-equipped with supplies and equipment and ready to build the 7-mile Grand Crimean Central Railway. (The name really lacked something like '& Pacific' or '& Hudson Bay' to add pizazz.)

Their surveyor had previously arrived after the typical two-month voyage in mid-January and his plan for the railway's construction was ready. Peto, Betts and Brassey never did travel to Crimea. Their experienced on-site engineer for the railway was James Beatty. 

Many of the navvies had previous experience with work on Canadian railways. Their warm clothes, construction skills, supporting logistics and provisions, and efficiency ... was the envy of the poor retched soldiers. Doctors, locomotive engineers, carpenters, and other support personnel were sent with this group as well. 

*  *  *
A Map of the Battlefields and Railway

Below, is the best map I could find of the siege area and the railway connecting the British forward positions to the harbour at Balaklava. You'll see that the Russian positions are yellow and that main military formations are arrayed from left to right: French, Turks (Ottoman), British, more French, and Sardinians (late arrivals are welcome). 

The bars represent the positions of the headquarters and reserve troops. You can see the jagged trenches and saps reaching the Russian perimeter. Many of the artillery batteries were positioned behind the infantry. 

Note: Some of the unit positions may have been specific to the battles fought in the area at different times and they may not represent the positions of units for the entire siege period. 

from: The History of the War with Russia; Tyrrell; 1900; London Printing & Publishing. archive.org


Railway Operations

from: Engines of War; Christian Wolmar; 2010; Perseus.

from: Delaware & Hudson; Jim Shaughnessy; 1982; Howell-North.

This undated image from some of the original Delaware & Hudson coal-mining lines in Pennsylvania shows the application of a stationary steam engine to haul railway cars up an 'inclined plane' railway using a cable. This system operated on part of the the D&H from the 1830s until circa 1900. A counterweight was attached to the 'loose end' (shown taut, passing under the cars) at the bottom of the grade to prevent tangling and fouling of the track. 

This inclined plane method was used early in the railway era, when contemporary engineering and construction techniques could not economically locate a line in areas of steep grades. If possible, descending routes would be longer with milder gradients to enable uncabled return movements. Control of these uncabled movements was performed by skilled brakemen using only handbrakes. 

*  *  *

from: The Seat of War in the East; Simpson; 1855,1902; Day & Son. archive.org

At first glance, I thought this image portrayed the transportation of the wounded. However, it is probably Ottoman Empire personnel marvelling at the railway. 

It should be noted that the railway materially improved the care and transportation of wounded soldiers. Before the railway, the wounded were shaken and jarred all the way from the front lines at Sebastopol to Balaklava. They were transported on litters borne by mules or horses in all types of weather. 

... Using this method, after first aid at a battlefield dressing station, and possibly further treatment by medical staff, it might take two or three hours to travel to Balaklava for eventual evacuation by ship to the Scutari hospital. Of course, a seriously-wounded patient would not survive the trip to Balaklava on the mule litters.

*  *  *

from: The Seat of War in the East; Simpson; 1855,1902; Day & Son. archive.org

The shelling component of the Siege of Sebastopol is being represented here. Thinking of the previous reference to explosive shells, it seems possible that the mortar 'cannon balls' with holes are designed to receive explosive and a fuse.

So, here we have an early example of a railway feeding the artillery before the US Civil War and the trench railways of World War One.

*  *  *

from: Pictorial History of the Russian War; George Dodd; 1856; W&R Chambers. archive.org

My blog post went to Crimea and all I got was some kid's line drawing of a train.

This is probably a deadhead move between Kadikoi and Balaklava - otherwise, wounded might be on board. The image of the animals struggling to drag wagons through the mud, further above, was also at Kadikoi. If someone asks, we can use these two images as 'before and after' justifications for the railway.

*  *  *

from: Atlas of Military History; Parker; 2004; Collins.

Above is a map showing most of the engagements of the Crimean War. 

Ironically, after describing the British efforts, it was the French who finally seized the Malakoff Redoubt on 8 September 1855, making further defence of Sebastopol untenable. The Russian field army had evacuated, destroying the remaining fortifications and naval facilities before they left. 

... The Malakoff Redoubt is shown on the largest map above: Find the centre of the harbour, then look to the harbour's south for: Malakoff 'White Tower'.

Regarding railways ... after their Black Sea re-supply routes were cut, Russia's campaign suffered from not having railways to support their counter-offensives on the Crimean Peninsula. 

In the end, Czar Nicholas and his campaign failed. He did not witness this, however, as he had died in February 1855. 

He was succeeded by his son who became Czar Alexander II (1818-1881). Alexander was a reformer who freed the Russian serfs (Catherine the Great, 1729-1796, used to give serfs away to her many paramours as parting gifts ... by the thousands!). Alexander continued Russian imperial expansion - but in different directions. 

... Burned by Britain in Crimea, he later sold Alaska to the US in 1867 to prevent it from being absorbed into Britain's North American colonies. 

Ultimately, the British-French 'success' in the Crimean War created no conditions which could not be reversed in due course by Russia. 


From cannon captured at Sebastopol were cast the first Victoria Crosses and 111 survivors of the war received this decoration. The Victoria Cross was not awarded posthumously until this policy was reversed in 1907. 

Metallurgical research has led to the conclusion that metal from captured Chinese cannon has been used since 1914 to create the medals. 


end


24 June 2017

GTR 1873 Changing the Gauge


Before every engine trots the ghost of a superseded horse.
H.G. Wells

The idea for this post originated from an interesting three-page document from archive.org summarizing the process used during the Grand Trunk's conversion of its single-tracked main line to Standard Gauge. However, when one starts researching, many more interesting tangents develop and a five-image post turns into a somewhat longer effort.

In hindsight, many things could have been done differently to avoid the series of financial errors and assorted disasters which culminated in the final bankruptcy of the Grand Trunk Railway.

Rail enthusiasts generally have an overriding interest in motive power. I have included a few photos of mid-1800s GTR power to evoke 'the era'. Imagine how 'cutting edge' this technology was back in the stage coach, sailing ship and early steamship era. By the same token, one can imagine all the capacity and reliability limits the railway pioneers were facing with their early motive power, only 20 years into Canada's railway era.

Considering the dominant land transportation of the day - horses dragging a vehicle on various high-friction and undulating roads - the railway was soon to become 'a magic carpet made of steel'. In Canada, some technical refinement was necessary before this could become reality. 

As you already know, the other side of 'low friction' is 'low adhesion' - the railway right-of-way had to be professionally engineered to limit grades. As you also already know, Canada's earliest railways were built mainly with human and animal muscle power and primitive explosives. 

Building a reasonable Rail Way was expensive enough ... without having to rebuild it because of technological problems or errors. And without kleptocratic opportunists siphoning off 'mobile, sensitive and scarce' capital to line their own pockets ... during the early phases of raising capital ... and during construction.


from: The Science of Railways; Marshall M Kirkman; 1894-1908; World Railway Publishing Co.

Convenience, necessity and imperial hubris combined to cause Canadian railway builders to assume that British rail technology was appropriate for use in Canadian conditions. Before mass production made steel rails of today's profile cheap, iron rails of British design were imported. Unbalanced wheels, on British-style rigid-framed equipment, pounding on brittle iron, on very cold Canadian winter days ... caused a very high rail failure rate.

The following passages come from:

Canada and the Grand Trunk, 1829-1924; HA Lovett; from archive.org

On Page 51, regarding the GTR construction in June 1860 ...


A decade later, coming from the position of Chairman of the Great Western Railway (the English GWR), Richard Potter 1817-1892, a British lawyer and businessman became Grand Trunk President from 1869 until 1876. He studied and then dealt decisively with a number of issues - financial and practical - which needed resolving. He received little thanks for his efforts.




A Canadian 'innovation' - Provincial Gauge - had cost the GTR a lot of money.

*  *  *

Here is Canada's railway network in 1860.

from: The Railway Builders; Oscar D Skelton; 1916; Glasgow, Brook & Co.
It is striking how the 1860 railway network is almost exclusively used to link bodies of water - the 'portage railways' were becoming longer and longer. An exception to this is the Grand Trunk - which parallels the St Lawrence River. 

One Canadian writer of the period suggested that British canals were little more than enlarged ditches compared to the waterways of Canada. For early Canadian bulk commodities for export ... such as timber and grains ... railways operating in competition with water had no hope of competing on capacity or price with natural waterways and/or canals. The period of the winter waterway freeze-up simply could not compensate for the railways' limited haulage capacity and relatively high operating costs.

*  *  *

The Debate About Gauge

from: GWR Company Servants; Janet KL Russell; 1983; Wild Swan Publications.
If you have ever watched YouTube videos showing Russian railways (with a gauge of 1520 mm - almost 5 feet) or Indian railways (1676 mm - 5.5 feet) it is easy to see that our Standard Gauge often leaves something to be desired with the potential to run today's best high capacity locomotives and rolling stock. 

It would not have been possible to finance many of North America's railways if the system had used a broader gauge in the 1800s. The extra initial cost of wider rock cuts and fills, more substantial bridges, heavier rail and more powerful motive power would have made many wilderness railway lines unaffordable. But ... perhaps this might have been a good thing ... as the Canadian network of the early 1900s would not have been as overbuilt as a result.

An extreme case of broad gauge (above) is the Great Western Railway of England - also known as God's Wonderful Railway. Here, its 7-foot gauge is being converted to Standard Gauge in May 1872. The line involved was from Gloucester to South Wales - about 500 miles of track, including double track and sidings which were all converted in that operation. 

*  *  *

Canada's Great Western Railway in 1860

from: Canadian Railways in Pictures; Robert F Legget; 1977; Douglas and McIntyre.
Here is the Great Western Railway of Canada at Paris Jct in 1860.
The Great Western converted to Standard Gauge between 1870 and 1873.
It was absorbed by the Grand Trunk in 1882.

The stub in the foreground seems to be broader.
Notice the turntable at the left, possibly with stock cars nearby.
There are raised switch targets/lamps.
The switchtender's cabin may be equipped with a telegraph.
The engineer stands at ground level with his oil can.
Of course, the fuel is wood and the locomotive has many interesting details.

For a post dealing primarily with Canadian track hardware and gauge before 1870 ...
it was extremely difficult to find any photographs displaying typical track structure well.
... Particularly of the Grand Trunk before conversion to Standard Gauge.

*  *  *

from: Railways; C Hamilton Ellis; 1974; Hulton Press.
Here (not dated) is John Roebling's railway suspension bridge near Niagara Falls ...
preserved in the station name Suspension Bridge.

In many cases, trains were pulled across by a special lightweight Great Western locomotive ...
which I think is shown here.

The gauges supported here are:
Standard Gauge - 4 ft, 8 1/2 inches.
Provincial Gauge - 5 feet, 6 inches.
Erie - 6 feet.

*  *  *

The Grand Trunk

from: Railroad History - 147, Autumn 1982; The Railway & Locomotive Historical Society. via Railfare. Omer Lavallee, Raymond Corley.
Here are three Grand Trunk locomotive photos - two before regauging and one after. They come from a particularly interesting edition of the publication noted. Omer Lavallee provided an overall corporate history of the Grand Trunk's development and its subsidiaries. Raymond Corley discussed motive power acquisitions ... and he and William Edson provided a full list of all Grand Trunk power - through its five renumberings.

The text notes that the Spitfire - 41, was built by Fairbairn as a 2-4-0 in 1855 and converted to a 4-4-0 circa 1860. It was scrapped in 1871.

from: Railroad History - 147, Autumn 1982; The Railway & Locomotive Historical Society. via Railfare. Omer Lavallee, Raymond Corley.
The Trevithick - 209 was the first locomotive built at the GTR's own shops at Point St Charles in May 1859. It was off the roster by 1874. It was the only locomotive of its class and speculation is that it is the namesake of the gentleman by the first driver. This photo is a favourite of CNR histories and generic railway history 'books by the pound'.

Dana William Ashdown has a very nice photo of 209's construction on page 29 of Iron & Steam; 1999; Robin Brass Studio.

These two Provincial Gauge locomotives participated in the regauging activities, and you'll find their numbers in the project document near the end of this post.

*  *  *

GTR After Regauging

from: Railroad History - 147, Autumn 1982; The Railway & Locomotive Historical Society. via Railfare. Omer Lavallee, Raymond Corley.
Standard Gauge GTR power is the Portland 1873 product, Eng 377.
The fuel is now coal (with wood kindling) and the track hardware is what you'd expect.


*  *  *

This Coles reprint provides interesting contemporary railway gauge details and debate.

... so many theories ... so many opinions ...
At the very end, watch for John A Macdonald's participation in the Provincial Gauge error.






*  *  *

This commentary on track gauge comes from civil engineer Thomas Coltrin Keefer's (1821-1915) essay Travel and Transportation - originally published in 1863. TC Keefer sited (apparently without much credit) the Victoria Bridge. He almost participated in the Grand Trunk Railway project and was frustrated in his life-long desire to lay out a Canadian railway. His single most notable engineering project was the design of Montreal's civic waterworks. He had a broad range of transportation, economics and engineering interests and writings.

from: Philosophy of Railroads; TC Keefer (ed. HV Nelles); 1972; University of Toronto.

from: Philosophy of Railroads; TC Keefer (ed. HV Nelles); 1972; University of Toronto.

*  *  *

Map of the Grand Trunk and Its Gauges

... Showing the full scope of GTW's gauge issue, particularly as it consolidated smaller lines.
This is Lavallee's map from the same source as the Spitfire and Trevithick photos.
The map was printed across the gutter of the book.
from: Railroad History - 147, Autumn 1982; The Railway & Locomotive Historical Society. via Railfare. Omer Lavallee, Raymond Corley.

*  *  *

This is how they organized the change of gauge ...




Above: Eng 68 and 212 are the numbers added.


In advance of the change of gauge, this advertisement was placed.


from: Railways of Canada; Nick and Helma Mika; 1972; McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
*  *  *

Sacred to the memory of those of us with links to the region ... was the last bastion of Provincial Gauge. This was the insular, 12 mile, portage railway, the Carillon and Grenville. Its Birkenhead, Canada Works, engine began its career with the Grand Trunk and operated on the C&G from about 1870 until 1910. Here it is passing over a stub switch.

from: Canadian Railways in Pictures; Robert F Legget; 1977; Douglas and McIntyre.

*  *  *

As old as the Grand Trunk locomotive Trevithick is this illustrated guide 
which my great-grandfather purchased secondhand. 

The first image includes Roebling's suspension bridge at Niagara Falls.

WS Hunter's Panoramic Guide from Niagara to Quebec; c1858; Collection of JHS Parke.

*  *  *

The second pair of images shows the layout of canals and railways around Montreal.
The new single-tracked Grand Trunk Railway can be seen.

(As usual, the larger image was cut to work around the Google algorithm size limits.)

WS Hunter's Panoramic Guide from Niagara to Quebec; c1858; Collection of JHS Parke.

WS Hunter's Panoramic Guide from Niagara to Quebec; c1858; Collection of JHS Parke.