07 November 2026

World War One - Assorted Images


Only two continents did not see organized conflict during World War One. 

Here are a few images from a three-volume account of the war which was published in 1921.

They include aspects of the war, its theatres and its technologies which are beyond the usual images of the Western Front.



Don't you just hate all these AI-slop images?

Statues and painted portraits generally called on the talents of accomplished artists. 
However, most of the people who see the enduring work never knew the subject personally. 

As long as the subject's face - as seen in historical images - matches the painted, sculpted or cast visage of the art, 
the artist has all kinds of latitude in their portrayal of the body. 

*  *  *


These before and after sets were popular during the war.

As the backdrop seems to be the same building, and we know they would not have taken their work clothes overseas, 
it seems likely this is a postwar photograph taken in Canada.

Second Ypres marked the first use of poisonous gas in war. The Germans had tried tear gas against the Russians in today's Poland, but cold weather prevented it from being effective. 

At Ypres (22 April 1915), the Germans released 168 tons of chlorine gas on a four-mile front. The Canadians were fighting in their first engagement and held, preventing a break-through of their lines. The Canadians faced a similar gas attack two days later.

*  *  *


In adapting old newspaper images for the book, the scale is not precisely preserved across the spine.



Here is our first look at a 'railway' used to transfer heavy items. 
This seems to be a particularly small submarine.

*  *  *


You can see the various sea routes used to reach Britain. Submarine service in the Great War (at least within the Royal Navy) was seen by traditionalists as being a sneaky endeavour which was largely without honour. 

Most submarines in the conflict used Rudolf Diesel's oil motor on the surface and batteries while submerged. Diesel travelled widely before his disappearance/death, so the technology was by no means a secret held solely by Germany. 

While the German submarine fleet menaced the approaches to Britain ... by the war's end ... it was the Royal Navy's blockade of Germany which caused the failure of their economy and agricultural production. The blockade-created loss of ... Chilean nitrates for fertilizer and munitions ... and rubber from South America and Asia ... are obvious examples. Civilians starved and the Kaiser's war machine lacked essential armaments and supplies.

*  *  *


In the past, it was the cavalry which darted around to obtain information on enemy positions. Once the war settled into the trenches on the Western Front, the cavalry was generally obsolete. This was the first major war in which both sides rose into the air to observe each other. Another important use of eyes at altitude was to direct artillery fire. 

Hydrogen balloons and observation aircraft (some performing early aerial photography) were soon confronted by the first gun-equipped fighter aircraft. Then fighters defended against fighters and rudimentary bombers as they sought to dominate the sky over their own territory.

German Zeppelins were sometimes used as night terror weapons over parts of Britain, but effective strategic (city) bombing would wait until another war came along.

*  *  *


The artillery made short work of traditional observation points such as church steeples, 
or a site familiar to the Canadians: the tower of the Cloth Hall at Ypres. 

This interesting novelty was probably operated by the soldier perched part-way up on that seat. 
The large lens at the end of the cone would be raised into position and, I guess, the light would enter that cone 
and travel via mirrors down the centre of the telescoping shaft to the operator.

This apparatus would be a hard target for enemy artillery to see and hit ... 
with the added advantage of being easy to move out of danger. 

*  *  *


British artillery would sometimes rage for a week before a major offensive. The term 'drumfire' was coined to describe a rapid, unceasing barrage that sounded like a drum being struck with regularity. Eventually, the infantry would have to advance across the area 'prepared' by artillery. As the image above suggests, the 'preparation' made the over-ground travel more difficult.

Besides wiping out the opposing soldiers (mainly using air-burst shrapnel shells), a goal of high explosive shells was to clear the barbed wire entanglements ... which were placed in front of the enemy's trenches to obstruct the progress of the infantry. These entanglements were also designed to stream the advancing infantry through points in the wire which were well-covered by machine guns.

One would expect there would be no resistance left after such long and intense artillery barrages aimed at the enemy. However, advancing infantry often found German troops greeting their arrival with rifle fire, intersecting arcs of machine gun fire and as many grenades as the Germans could throw. 

You can see the reason below ...


Ignore the fact that the Germans left a mess when they retreated. Except for a small rotating contingent left to maintain a watch on the surface, the majority of the German forces were protected from the preparatory barrage within the deep, well-designed bunkers the Germans built. 

When the barrage ceased, most of the soldiers (those who were not PTSD casualties after an intense barrage lasting hours or days) would run up the stairs and resume their defensive positions. This happened time and again with the British staff officers being apparently very slow to accept how their extravagant use of artillery was having little effect.

*  *  *


World War One was the last major war in which so many heads of state were kings, emperors ... and a czar and a sultan. This was the last great war of the European empires. 

For Canada, the Balfour Declaration (1926) opened the door to a new status for Canada and the other British dominions ... and the Statute of Westminster (1931) gave it legal force. 
 
The term 'Empire' was often used by the diehard British imperialists in World War Two to refer to both its world-wide Commonwealth ... and centralized plans like the 'Empire Air Training Scheme'. However, in 1939 Canada had the legal ability to declare war itself and it substituted its BCATP title for the British EATS.

From the south to the north of Africa, and into today's Middle East, the empires fought each other. Germany lost its African colonies at the end of World War One. None of Africa's citizens really won freedom as a result. The colony just changed ownership to another European country. 

The demand to return the German African colonies was one of the concessions Hitler sought as he bullied, bluffed and threatened the European countries with war in the late 1930s.

*  *  *


The title spans the book's spine, while the text of Page 472 is read first, before Page 473. 
Otherwise, this technology is completely interpreted!



Invented as a supplement to livestock fencing in France in the late 1800s, then perfected in the US and Germany, it was uncoiled all over the globe in war. The effectiveness of barbed wire in war had been demonstrated in the Boer War and the Russo-Japanese War. 

Germany had included barbed wire in its extensive tactical doctrine before World War One and possessed substantial pre-war inventories of it. 

The ergonomic wooden carrying handles are a thoughtful feature. Another little railway for transporting heavy loads.

*  *  *


If you believe that ethnic minorities and those at the bottom of the social pyramid were 'always', and will 'always' be brutally exploited in war ... throughout Russian, Soviet, and Russian (again) history ... you are probably correct. This was certainly the case for Imperial Russian soldiers on Germany's eastern front during the war.

Unarmed soldiers waited to 'inherit' rifles from others who were killed. Good footwear, winter clothing, and artillery shells were rare commodities. However, disease epidemics, very poor medical care, and incompetent aristocratic leadership were available in limitless abundance.




Just as the term "Die Damen aus der Hölle" was probably not coined by the Germans for those fighting in kilts ... the "Battalion of Death" was probably also self-referential public relations. 

It worked! 
They made it into this blogpost!

No more humour, this story is grim ...

The "1st Russian Women's Battalion of Death" "1-y Zhenskiy Batal'on Smerti" (if you want to get a rough sound of it in Russian) was formed after some lobbying by Mariia Bochkareva (1889-1920). Although there were a number of other units set up along similar lines within the Imperial Russian Army, Bochkareva certainly earned ownership of the trademark.

Concisely: these units were intended as shock troops to lead attacks ... and particularly to shame Russian male soldiers into fighting. 

Bochkareva narrowly escaping death after Bolsheviks captured this unusual, determined, brave soldier of the Imperial Army. There was no doubting her dedication to 'Russia'. Probably, there are few things as brutal as a civil war.

In the summer of 1918, Bochkareva sought the support of the US and Britain. She travelled from Vladivostok to San Francisco, Washington (meeting with President Woodrow Wilson), dictated her autobiography in New York, and continued to Britain where she had an audience with King George V. 

Back in Russia, she was again captured by the Bolsheviks ... who questioned her loyalty to their particular ideology ... and eventually executed.

This link at archive.org takes you to the dictated autobiography of Mariia Bochkareva (1889-1920),
and ends as she departs for the US.


*  *  *


Map of Mesopotamia and Persia.

*  *  *


The US sold and exported approximately $7-8 billion worth of goods to Britain, France, Russia and Italy between the beginning of the war, and the US entry into World War One on 6 April 1917. Converted for inflation, this is over US $182 billion in 2026 US dollars. 

In 2025, the US exported US $190 billion of goods to those four countries. 
Total US goods and services exports to these four countries in 2025 was about US $350 billion. 






I miss the old steam fantrips ... don't you? ...





*  *  *

Back to the Middle East ...


It seems there's always someone who doesn't actually live here ... complaining about the sea routes.





In the end, we are pleased to find some agreement between the nations.



31 October 2026

1952 Canada's Defence Program. Sabres, Clunks & Arrows.


 Canada once spent 7.4% of GDP on defence in peacetime.

This is a final look at Canada 75 years ago as presented in the Canada Yearbook. 

In 2026, as we re-arm and review our ideas of which allies to place more trust in, this article describes a similar period of transition.

In 1952, Britain was working to repair its war-damaged cities and industries. It was beginning to pay off the tremendous debt load incurred during the war. Expressed in Canadian dollars of 2026, Britain was $2.2 trillion in debt. Britain's war loans from Canada and the US were only completely paid off in 2006.

In contrast to Britain, the United States had done well economically in both world wars ... as it was protected from most direct enemy action by ... 'the stopping power of water'. Its factories turned out and sold large quantities of war essentials.

After extensive industrial investment during the Second World War, the US was the pre-eminent nuclear science, aviation, and manufacturing power of the world when the war ended.

*  *  *

As the war started, Britain's 1939 ally, Canada, was producing weapons of British design. The challenge after the war was to set up Canada's factories to produce US-designed aircraft and armaments ...


 


To compensate for inflation, multiply 1952 dollar values x12 to convert to 2026 dollars.

1952: $1.94 billion
2026: over $23 billion 

Defence expenditures stood at 6.8% of GDP in 1952 and peaked at 7.4% of GDP in 1953.

At this point, 3.5% to 4% of GDP was spent on social programs and transfers.
This was mainly for OAS (at age 70), Family Allowance and Veterans' Rehabilitation.




The United Nations and The United Nations

The United Nations 'brand' had originally been used in 'our' propaganda to describe 'The Allies' in the Second World War. 

To participate in the drafting of the charter of 'The United Nations' in San Francisco in April-June 1945, it was necessary to have declared war on 'The Axis Powers'. That declaration had to be signed before 1 March 1945.

Post-War Developments in Korea

Was the Korean conflict (1950-1953) a 'police action of The United Nations' ? 

... or ...

Was the Korean War part of a comprehensive US doctrine to contain the communist power of the USSR?

... The answer is 'yes'.

As they did in Europe, after the Japanese surrender, the Allies occupied and partitioned some Asian countries such as Korea. The USSR zone in post-war Korea was in the north.

In the South

In South Korea, the future President, Syngman Rhee (1875-1965), had been returned from exile in the US. Between 1948 and 1960, South Korean elections could not have been considered 'free and fair'. Rhee was effectively a dictator who crushed dissent. He was deliberately under-armed by the US so he wouldn't turn around and invade the North. 

Unique in its diplomatic statements about Asia, the US avoided defining 'territorial red lines' in Korea. Sometimes, it's preferable to be silent on failures of democracy. 

In the North

Stalin's preferred candidate (after long deliberation) to lead North Korea, Kim Il Sung (1912-1994) had returned from exile in China. The apparent US ambivalence about arming and protecting South Korea was seen as an opportunity by Kim ... that he could take over the south.

... Stalin finally gave his permission for Kim's invasion. China eventually pledged to support this action if the US got involved. 

North Korea began a surprise invasion of the South on 25 June 1950. 

*  *  *

The Soviet Union was boycotting the United Nations Security Council over its failure to recognize China's new government: The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China (1949).

'Police Action' ... not a War

... Without a USSR UNSC veto, it was possible for US President Harry Truman to avoid the necessity of obtaining a declaration of war from the US Congress because the UN Security Council Passed Resolutions 82 and 83, which allowed a UN action to go ahead. A coalition of 21 nations, including Canada, participated in this 'police action' of the United Nations. 

In April 1950, the US National Security Council had passed a top-secret doctrine - NSC-68 - for the 'containment' of Soviet power. The Korean War was its 'first test' when The People's Republic of China joined the conflict to support North Korea.

*  *  *

These developments helped let loose the profligate spending by many countries ('on both sides') ... in the development of all the exponentially-redundant horrors of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems ... and modern biological and chemical weapons ... and future proxy wars between superpowers. 





While it is perhaps nationally prestigious to possess a pre-owned aircraft carrier. Their main use in recent history has been to project a nation's foreign policy at various locations chosen around the globe. 



Canada now makes weapons of US design, rather than of British design.


A veteran of the RCAF, volunteering at the Aviation Museum in Ottawa, offered his opinion to me that the CF-100 was nicknamed 'The Clunk' because of the sound made by the oversized nose-gear strut and door which closed with some force right underneath the cockpit.

He also suggested that the loss of the Avro Arrow (see below) was not as tragic as it seems today because it would have been 'just another Avro plane' [meaning: with lower-quality engineering and refinement than its 'great power' brand-name competitors]. He had spent some of his career in CF-101 Voodoos.





This is the end of the Canada 1952 Yearbook article.

*  *  *

Here is a Canada 1953 Yearbook article:

The opening refers to Prime Minister Louis St Laurent (1882-1973).

The United Nations had no access to a deployable standing army. 

So NATO provides its members with a pledge of mutual aid.



'It must become much more than a defensive alliance'. 

Should NATO constitute a pickup 'street gang' anytime a member starts a war?

No ... and Canada-drafted Article 2 aims to promote some of the softer democratic skills.

... and also "eliminating conflict in their national economic policies".

(World-wide blog visitors from our miraculous AI future: This post is from late October 2026.)





The aircraft 'letterboard' can't be resolved.
Below the windows: Air Transport Command.

Accounts from this era suggest that these transport activities were very challenging for RCAF personnel.

*  *  *

from: Fall of an Arrow; Murray Peden; 1978; Canada's Wings.

In the Canadian House of Commons ...

" ... the greatest single achievement in Canadian aviation history, and the greatest combined effort of design and development ever undertaken in this country."

"Not only that, I regret, and I want to put this on record again, that this government, did not have the courage to finish (Arrow) No 6 and let it take the world's speed record away from the Lockheed 104. I think this is a matter which will cause regret to Canadians for decades to come - that when we had reached a stage where, in a few weeks of additional development and testing, this plane could have captured the world's speed record for this country, the decision should have been made not only to stop work on the plane but to cut up the corpse and put it underground as soon as possible."

... Liberal Paul Hellyer commenting on the decision of Prime Minister John Diefenbaker on 20 February 1959 to cancel the CF-105 Arrow. 

The 5 finished aircraft were cut up in secret in mid-April with only an enterprising photographer in a private aircraft circumventing the prohibition on photographing the event. 

According to this book, about 30,000 employees and employees of subcontractors were laid off. A reporter calculated that the severance costs would have paid for the production of the first 37 aircraft.

Many of the best Canadian professionals from this program were snapped up by the US space program and by US corporations specializing in aviation. 

*  *  *

from: Canadian Nuclear Weapons; John Clearwater; 1998; Dundern Press.

... And we bought their F-104 Starfighter. 

Except ... with the advent of Soviet ICBMs which could be accurately targeted (early 1960s) ... and ballistic missile submarines ... there was little remaining need for high-speed interceptors to destroy bombers flying over the arctic region to attack North America. 

Right off the bat: The Arrow and the Starfighter became useless. The admitted coolness of the hardware is quite distinct from what a wise government would do with the money.

In the scene above, the RCAF in western Europe ... would be doled out low-yield nuclear weapons by US personnel ... the latter working inside a fortified US nuclear arms compound within the RCAF airfield. 

The Starfighter was designed to operate at high altitude. However, in this mission it was to skim over the land until it went vertical to 'loft' the bomb ... which would fall by parachute onto its Warsaw Pact target (all with the aid of a computer onboard the Starfighter). 

In the battlefield chaos surrounding a real nuclear exchange between the US and the USSR, it is extremely hard to imagine how the outcome of this mission would be worth the cost of the hardware, training, maintaining readiness and all the other associated costs, including the pilot's life.

... However, in the 1970s and 1980s there were all kinds of ideas which kept military planners lucratively employed.


And ... to quote the arcade game Missile Command ...

The End