Showing posts with label Rudolf Diesel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rudolf Diesel. Show all posts

04 April 2026

Diesel Fuel

A 40% premium on diesel fuel?! What happened?

A Volkswagen Rabbit which sounded like a farm tractor was never something I found attractive. However, during the oil price gyrations of the 1970s and 1980s, a number of people did choose diesel passenger vehicles because the fuel was 10-20% cheaper and diesel engines were significantly more fuel efficient than those powered by gasoline. 

Elsewhere, the 1970s and 1980s were characterized by the same old domestic North American products, showing little re-engineering or innovation. Tariff barriers often helped ensure they were made in this country or on this continent. They were relatively expensive. Electronics?: a cathode ray tube TV (maybe colour), a stereo for your 'records', a VCR. An audio cassette player in the car!

Welcome to the 2020s! 

Diesel is more of a globally-traded and -priced commodity today. With this blog's favourite Strait facing selective traffic attenuation, Persian Gulf crude oil is not getting to European refineries ... but our refined diesel fuel is. I saw a Sky News (UK) story today with a graph showing that Canada has the largest diesel fuel reserves in the world. I guess 'had' would be more accurate. 

Since 2000, there has been explosive innovation in new products. Twenty years ago, we could not have imagined all the changes which have taken place - both the new products and the changes they have caused in our societies. 

And now, the whole economy of the "globalized world" runs on diesel - from the trucks moving the shipping containers to the docks of China, Vietnam, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan ... up to and including the wide assortment of courier trucks racing up and down our street every single weekday ... and now on weekends.

And the Europeans have perfected clean diesel automobiles! These are not your father's Volkswagens!

With the US military on the move in recent months, 'middle distillates' diesel and jet fuel are in greater demand than usual. 

Farmers are planting - creating the usual seasonal demand on diesel ... and they are not happy about the price changes.

And if your experience and knowledge-based hunch is that the higher diesel fuel demand will continue or increase ... petroleum financial derivatives, or a loaded petroleum tanker slow-steaming or loitering between here and Europe or Asia ... is even more of a sure thing than a White House insider pre-Tweet bet on a prediction market. 

*  *  *

Diesel - How It Began

https://archive.org/details/11650204bsb/page/n4/mode/1up

Rudolf Diesel (1858-1913)

If you were to copy and paste the link above, you could read Rudolf Diesel's original treatise. 
Warning: lots of German ... even more math!

*  *  *

screencap from: Rudolf Diesel, Pioneer of the Age of Power; Nitske & Wilson; 1965; U of Oklahoma Press. archive.org 

*  *  *

screencap from: Diesel, Technology and Society in Industrial Germany; Donald E Thomas Jr; 1987; U of Alabama Press. archive.org

Diesel's patent from the Kaiser. 
M-A-N is the abbreviation of Maschinenfabrik Augsburg Nürnberg. 
It will appear again below.

*  *  *

from: Iron Horse to Diesel; Paul Snow; 1961; Whitman.

From a childhood storybook, came this image. I love the artist's flying cogwheels. I believe there were two motor explosions in different settings. One was fuelling with ammonia, the other was using a powdered coal/water slurry. 

During my research, I was reminded that General Electric was experimenting with a powdered coal fuel for a diesel-electric prototype in 1990 ... but there was a note that railroads would have to indicate an interest in the technology for the development to continue. 

*  *  *

screencap from: Rudolf Diesel, Pioneer of the Age of Power; Nitske & Wilson; 1965; U of Oklahoma Press. archive.org

*  *  *

The new fields of aviation and diesel power must have set records for the 'short elapsed time' between the invention of a technology, and its application in war-fighting. 

Elsewhere on this blog, you'll find that a recent Rudolf Diesel biographer speculated that his apparent English Channel ferry suicide was a cover orchestrated by the British to spirit him off to Montreal. This was on the evening of 29 September 1913, on the SS Dresden, steaming between Antwerp and Harwich, England. 

Overnight, on 1 January 1915, the Vickers shipyard at Montreal was turned into a high-security facility with a complete change of personnel. The British Admiralty oversaw the building of 10 H-Class submarines by a workforce of 2000 Americans. The biographer's theory is that the multi-lingual, well-travelled Diesel was 'an expert' brought in to apply Diesel's latest technologies there.

Meanwhile ...

from: Die Höllenmaschine Im U-Boot; Kapitän Herbert Sauer; 1928; August Scherl. archive.org

Top: In the oil engine room of a U-boat in front of the main switch and the engine telegraph.

Bottom: In the diving control center, forward port side. High-pressure compressed air distribution system. In the center of it, the base of the central periscope with eyepiece. Central control station with repeater gyrocompass. Top left, engine telegraph. On the right, under the clock, the quick-venting handwheels of the forward ballast tanks.

*  *  *

from: Geology of Petroleum; William Harvey Emmons; 1921; McGraw-Hill.

At one point, Ontario was Canada's premier petroleum producing province.
The tar/bitumen/oil ... sands are the source of the heavy oil which facilitates the production of large quantities of diesel fuel.

*  *  *

The 1930s, United States ...

There was enough interest in diesel engines in the late 1920s and all through the 1930s, that a magazine existed to write about all the different applications in which the technology could be used. The advertisements are particularly good at depicting this potential. 

Notice the United Fruit Company motive power, pulling what looks like sugar cane. There is a good chance this operation was in Cuba. Unlike the many steam locomotives already present on Cuban railways, these light diesels were able to operate with less maintenance. They didn't have the thirst for water of the steam engines. They were also less likely to emit sparks which could set fire to the dried cane as it stood in the fields.

from: Diesel Progress magazine; June 1935; Diesel Engines Inc. archive.org

*  *  *

The gimmicky, art-deco, streamlined trainsets rode like maintenance-of-way speeder trailers but they spurred on many technological changes.

from: Diesel Progress magazine; June 1935; Diesel Engines Inc. archive.org

*  *  *

Coming to German Cinemas in 1942 ...

from: https://archive.org/details/diesel0000illu/mode/1up

The text-heavy side of this November 1942 German leaflet concludes: 
"A man and a fighter triumphed. And with him, his idea, his work, which changed the face of the global economy."

... Probably the 'Reichsminister für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda' did not subscribe to the theory 
that Rudolf Diesel disappeared in order to build Royal Navy submarines in Montreal. 

I've watched parts of this movie - it's on YouTube.
The directing is a little heavy-handed ...

*  *  *

1950 - General Motors Booklet

from: Diesel the Modern Power; Ralph A Richardson; 1950; General Motors. 


from: Diesel the Modern Power; Ralph A Richardson; 1950; General Motors.


from: Diesel the Modern Power; Ralph A Richardson; 1950; General Motors.

To make interpretation a little easier ... the three little rocker arms above the cylinder show you when the valves and the injector are doing something. 

The two-cycle innovation is 'scavenging'. Instead of using a piston cycle just to push the exhaust gases out ... an attached blower clears them and replaces them with fresh air at the same time. Consequently, every 'downward' piston movement is a power stroke. 

These opposed-piston engines were even more efficient ...
but, as adapted space-saving marine/submarine engines, 
they were more complicated, too different, and too troublesome in the long run.

*  *  *

From a 1957 Textbook on Petroleum ...

from: Petroleum, Prehistoric to Petrochemicals; GA Purdy; 1957; Copp Clark. 

*  *  *

A Transport Canada Railway Locomotive Document from 2001
(a quarter of a century ago)

This material will not be on the proverbial test. 
Perhaps some readers may be interested in how some of these older units compare.
This publication says this data comes from AAR testing.

IG is Imperial Gallon
MM is millions
NOx and SOx are oxides of nitrogen and sulphur.
HC - hydrocarbons, unburned 'oil'
PM is probably PM 2.5, the nasty little bits of soot that can pass from the lungs into the bloodstream.

from: Diesel Fuel Quality and Locomotive Emissions in Canada; Robert Dunn; 2001; Transport Canada. archive.org


I believe that Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (bsfc) is a way of expressing fuel efficiency. It is more complicated that the 'best' fuel efficiency ... because it factors in cycles of performance under different conditions. The lower bsfc numbers indicate a more efficient engine.

A 'brake dynamometer' attaches to a crankshaft and applies different measured braking (i.e. resistance) forces on it to simulate the various loads under which the engine works.

While the newer units don't seem to offer significantly better efficiency on a 1:1 basis ... the text reminds us that they provide more power per unit and that they burn the fuel with less pollution.


from: Diesel Fuel Quality and Locomotive Emissions in Canada; Robert Dunn; 2001; Transport Canada.

*  *  *

Diesel Engines in Ships

When we get to the use of 'diesel' in large modern ocean ships such as tankers and containerships, there is not one single type of fuel which is burned. Ships carry multiple fuel tanks to allow for cost-effective operation or for low-pollution operation.

Since 2020, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has required that all ships (unless using scrubbers) must carry fuel oil with no more than 0.50% sulphur content (mass/mass). In specific Emission Control Areas (ECA) fuel with no greater than 0.10% sulphur content can be used. Effective March 2027, the Canadian Arctic and Norwegian Sea become ECAs with the 0.10% sulphur regulation becoming effective.

The text below revisits my 1957 petroleum textbook. The unrefined petroleum is still the same today. The processes for refining it are more complex, so I sometimes like to start with the basic explanation of what they did 75 years ago in simpler times. 

The last paragraph is still applicable. The ship owner is not going to allow the ship's engineers to put just any kind of fuel in a marine diesel engine that costs millions of dollars. 


from: Petroleum, Prehistoric to Petrochemicals; GA Purdy; 1957; Copp Clark.

In reading about future 'alternative fuels' to be used instead of diesel fuel for shipping ... e.g. biodiesel, hydrogen, ammonia*, methanol*, LNG*, etc ... I get the impression they all have some characteristic which makes them impractical outside of those ECAs which require low sulphur fuel. (*Currently used in Emission Control Areas.)

For example: fuels may be scarce and expensive; or, they may consist of the smallest molecule which is always escaping and its supercooled liquid form damages the metal it interacts with; or, potentially extremely toxic to the crew if not handled with great care; or, not containing enough energy per unit and/or requiring more specialized handling than diesel oil. 
Exception: On ships designed to carry LNG ... the ship can be designed to use the 'boiled off' vapour exclusively as fuel.

As with the previously-presented locomotive fleet (and our current automobile fleet) ... owners are unlikely to scrap a piece of equipment which has only been in service for 5 years. Tankers and containerships generally have a service life of 20-30 years. The main engine usually works for the whole lifespan of the hull. 

... So if a miracle like cheap solar-powered electric containerships suddenly descended down upon the earth, the ship owners would probably continue to use their old ships, burning their old fuels, until the end of their normal service lives.

*  *  *

Another interesting thing about modern ocean ships such as tankers and containerships ... 

We have all seen that they are 'welded together' in China or South Korea using cheap labour and/or very intensive automation. You should see some of the plate steel cutting/handling/welding automation videos! ...

However, these mass-produced ships are a 'global trade product'. Sure, the steel is made, the 'unfair subsidies' given, and the brute force assembly is done in Asia. However, the complete engines generally come from Europe. The electronic control systems may come from somewhere else, etc. 

*  *  *

A Ship Built in 2025

from: CGTN news website.

Recently completed in China, this Greek-owned tanker will carry 850-900,000 barrels of oil - depending on the oil's density. 

If you can imagine about 115 of these ships fully-loaded ... it would represent the world's petroleum use on a single day.

The Seascout is powered by a MAN B&W 6G60ME-C Mk9.5 engine - a low-speed, six-cylinder, two-stroke marine diesel. It puts out approximately 22,850 horsepower or 17,040 kW. Its engine drives the propeller directly with no transmission between the engine and the prop. It generally operates at 60-85 RPM (range 20-95 RPM), travelling at about 14 knots. 

You may have noticed the 'MAN' (Maschinenfabrik Augsburg Nürnberg) which takes us right back to one of Rudolf Diesel's first engine builders. Just like General Electric, the name endures but the corporate structures have changed over the decades. I believe MAN is now owned by Volkswagen's parent. 

* * *

People may remember that during the first oil crisis, top highway speeds were reduced, to decrease the fuel burned by highway vehicles ... because of the exponential resistance of air as a car's speed increases ...

The Danish shipping line Maersk first came up with the idea of 'slow steaming'. As with the highway speed reduction, the idea was to decrease the exponential resistance of the water at higher speeds to save on fuel costs. They ran a trial involving 110 ships in 2007. Adjustments were required to the ship engines to avoid damaging them by running them at speeds for which they weren't designed. By dropping the speed from 24 knots to 14-18 knots they found they could reduce fuel consumption by 30% or more. 

Obviously, containerships in high demand and operating on a schedule will operate at higher speeds when necessary.

However, for bulk commodities, ship fuel economy is often more important for profitability than speed. This is particularly the case when petroleum is going to remain 'at sea' for a period of time. There, it waits for the shipowner or product consignor to determine that a given market will provide an advantageous price ... and the ship is then instructed to dock and make delivery.

* * *

He was born in a foreign country. He lived and worked in poverty during his first decade of life. He was subsequently deported to another foreign country at the onset of the Franco-Prussian War.

Rudolf Diesel hoped that poorer countries could fuel his simpler engines with whichever plant oils they had in abundance. He hoped people could derive the economic benefits of efficient, modern motor power. 

Diesel never could have imagined how his invention would dominate the world's transportation system over a century later.

'His work changed the face of the global economy.'


end


30 August 2025

EMD 1948 Kettering; Oil for V; Winton 201a; EMD 567B; 5 Diesels; B&O's EAs; Canada's 24 Subs

An engineer by the name of McCorkill was the previous owner of Rolly Martin's house. He left behind a rich assortment of books from the steam and early diesel-electric era. 

It would be very interesting to see Schreiber during this era as Mr McCorkill did. The books he left in Rolly's basement illustrate some of the history of the switch from steam to diesel.

Almost every week, I plan to take it easy for a change and a rest, and post something simple. This little booklet was going to be one such effort. My ride down the long, slippery slope of research happened when I looked up the author of the following booklet.

Who would stand like that in a three-piece suit and affix a facsimile signature to a little booklet on diesel oil?

Why would anyone feel they had to make the case that there would be adequate supplies of petroleum products in a booklet like this?




I should have remembered the name because Charles Kettering (1876-1958) had figured prominently in On Time, The History of the Electro-Motive Division of General Motors Corporation; Franklin M Reck; 1948; GM. I read that a year or so ago. 

At a previous job, Kettering invented something which many of us use every single day of our lives.

And I already knew why petroleum product availability was a big deal in American society when that booklet was written (1948) because I'm currently reading Oil for Victory (1946).

from: Oil for Victory; Editors of Look Magazine; 1946; McGraw-Hill. 

The whole theme of this book is the extraordinary efforts made by the petroleum industry, and American industry in general, to produce, move and refine oil during World War Two.

German U-boats were lighting up coastal crude and product tankers on the US east coast, so Mississippi barges and the railroads became an interim solution. Eventually there was the 'Big Inch' Pipeline (24 inches in diameter) which went through ... without today's environmental assessment or consultation with property owners. 

As an example of the resourceful use of alternate systems during this emergency ... the re-tasking of tank cars resulted in Upper New England residents freezing because their usual tank cars of heating and cooking kerosene had been reassigned. To solve this problem, oil drums of kero were loaded into boxcars for delivery to them instead.

No sooner had the delivery of petroleum been maximized across the Atlantic to support the D-Day Landings ... than the majority of it was redirected to flow west in August 1944 at the rate of 110,000 barrels per day to the Pacific Ocean - mainly through Texas and the southern tier of US states, by rail. 

... So, after the war, American public opinion was sensitive to any 'lobby' which might want to exploit 'the shortage of petroleum products brought about by an unprecedented post-war demand'. The country had just made great sacrifices and experienced great shortages of civilian petroleum during wartime.

From the book: If you are ever in an exam asking which two innovative petroleum products won the war, your answers are: butadiene and 100-octane gasoline. New processes had to be developed in the labs to increase their production exponentially. 

Back to the booklet ...







Charles Kettering was one of those great inventors who had that early-1900s genius for mechanical invention, the ability to increase the efficiency of existing systems, and the insight to innovate and create new systems.

He invented the automotive battery-powered 'self-starter' so car motors no longer needed to be manually cranked to start. He founded the Dayton Engineering Laboratories Co. You can work out the familiar acronym for the company name. It was bought by General Motors in 1920 as its research institute and Kettering served as the director of GM research for 27 years.

He was also involved with the idea of adding tetraethyl lead to gasoline for its anti-knock properties, and the hazards of lead were well-known back then. Um ... but did I mention that '100-octane' gasoline helped win the war? 

... Uh ... maybe he was the co-inventor of Freon ... a little? ... [looking at my shoes, avoiding eye contact].

*  *  *

Why did Engineer McCorkill have this booklet?

The Electro-Motive Company had developed gas-electric, then oil-electric self-propelled railcars. But gasoline was kind of a fire hazard and the distillate oil required a high-voltage spark plug system for ignition. The plugs were always getting fouled by the oil. These motors were manufactured by the Winton Engine Company, which had previously been an automobile manufacturer. 

However, when EMC's cars were working, railroads loved them and these passenger railcars became popular as cost-effective yard switchers. With more money, EMC's founders might be able to develop a broader market with these vehicles.


Charles Kettering, formerly of Delco, now at General Motors (research) was looking for power for his new yacht. He was interested in the Winton engines and his yacht became a testbed for experimental Winton diesel engines so he could play with them.

In 1930, with The Great Depression beginning, General Motors purchased the Electro-Motive Company and the Winton Engine Company. Eugene Kettering (1908-1969) was the son of Charles Kettering and he went to work at Winton in 1930 at the head of a project to develop lighter, more powerful diesel engines. 

Diesel engines were heavy 4-cycle motors whose weight was better suited to marine applications than any vehicle moving on land. 

Circa 1930, in addition to Eugene's quest for a railroad diesel engine, the US Navy was looking for diesels suitable for use in their new submarines. 

As Charles later described it, Eugene's work (perhaps with Charles watching over his shoulder) started with one cylinder. Components ... like valves, fuel pumps, injectors ... were added one by one with the view to having the lightest and most efficient engine possible. 

A 2-cycle diesel engine had been conceived in 1899 by a German engineer but it wasn't particularly efficient and never went into production. The advantage of the 2-cycle diesel was that almost twice as much work was being done by the pistons, so you needed fewer of them.

This diagram from another of Engineer McCorkill's books illustrates the difference. 

 
from: A Power Primer; 1944; General Motors Corporation.

The hardest challenge to be overcome is how to exhaust the combustion gases ... AND ... introduce fresh air and fuel at the same time. This could eliminate a whole piston trip up and down the cylinder - 2 cycles eliminated. Here is the general solution ...

... Near the end of the power stroke, the piston uncovers vents surrounding the cylinder. High pressure air enters through these vents and quickly purges the exhaust gases and recharges the cylinder with air ... completing this entire function before the piston starts its trip up the cylinder with its compression cycle. So a total of 2 cycles.

... Precisely designed fuel injectors operate under high pressure and create a mist of fuel at the optimal time during compression so that the heat of compression ignites this fuel mist at the top of the piston's travel. 

All of the high pressures and high temperatures created in a working diesel presented considerable engineering challenges for the designers to overcome.

The result of the first design which Eugene Kettering accomplished with his team was the Winton 201A engine. It was a 12-cylinder, 2-cycle diesel which entered production in 1934.

In General Motors' 1948 EMD history, this engine is downplayed as being designed mainly for submarines, but too light for railroad service.

We'll revisit the main application of the short-lived Winton 201A in a moment.

First, here is the revolutionary EMD 567B engine illustrated in a variety of cutaway views. This design flowed from the lessons learned from the 201A. It provided dependable high power, while weighing as little as possible. It ensured the success of GM EMD as it captured most of the diesel locomotive market during and after World War Two.

(Except for the Fairbanks-Morse opposed-piston designs, I believe that the other First Generation diesel locomotives of other companies used 4-cycle engines. The F-M engines were apparently an unlicensed design, adapted from a German submarine engine.)


from: Locomotive Cyclopedia; 1950; Simmons Boardman. 

*  *  *

Here is a handy summary of key dates in EMD's evolution,
which provides additional details of events and dates ...

from: Electro-Motive: Young Giant, article; David P Morgan; November 1948; Trains, Kalmbach. 

*  *  *

Here is an image which demanded some extra research ...

from: Kettering Digest; Various Authors; 1982; Reflections Press.  at archive.org

There is absolutely no detail in Kettering Digest or in On Time (the EMD self-history from 1948) or in Kettering biographies at archive.org to suggest who might be in the photo with Kettering. I read Douglas Brunt's 2023 biography of Rudolf Diesel a few months ago. 

Diesel Data

Rudolf Diesel (1858-1913) married Martha Flasche (1860-1944) in 1883 in Munich.

They had three children:
  • Rudolf Jr. (1884-1944) Married New Yorker Daisy Weiss in Manhattan in 1911.
  • Hedwig (1885-1968)
  • Eugen (1889-1970) Writer on subjects like the effects of technology on society.
There are photos of Eugen as he travelled in the US and that doesn't look like Eugen. I could not find a single photo of Rudolf Jr.

A letter from an acquaintance in Missouri was sent to Rudolf Jr early in World War One expressing both concern and best wishes as Rudolf Jr spent time at the Front. I could find no indication what he was doing there or how long he was in the war zone. 

He seems to have inherited aspects of his father's psychological challenges and through his life he often seemed depressed and withdrawn. After the War, he is described as being a recluse.

Knowing Kettering's passion for engineering innovation and his intense involvement in diesel-electric development, what could be better than having the person closest to the original inventor in your newest diesel as you change history with it. Even if it meant cajoling him out of contented isolation for a few moments.

In the photo above, Kettering is 61 years old and - if it was Rudolf Jr - he would be 53.

*  *  *

from: Our GM Scrapbook; 1971; Kalmbach Publishing.

The image above is from May, 1937 and it shows B&O 51, the first EA to be delivered to that railroad.
That would be the locomotive in the previous photo with the two men.

*  *  *

from: The Second Diesel Spotter's Guide; Jerry A Pinkepank; Kalmbach Books. 

The EA (x6) and EB (x6) units which the B&O received (12 units total) were each powered by two 201-A engines, putting out a total of 1800 horsepower. They rode on A-1-A trucks. They were built between May 1937 and June 1938. Above, Engine 56 is shown at Parkersburg, West Virginia in 1941.

*  *  *

Diesel Update

Until reading Brunt's 2023 biography, I hadn't read about Rudolf Diesel at all since I was 7 or 8 years old, perhaps. Here is what I would have blogged at that age:

"Rudolf Deisel invented the deisel. This is kind of boring because he didn't do the steam engines at Turcot Yard or fantrips or any of the Canadian deisels at 40th Avenue. He lived in Germany all the time. One day he escaped from Germany on a boat so he could give the deisel secret to England. But a German spy threw him off the boat. Getting thrown off a boat at night is scary so be careful and don't let this happen."


from: Iron Horse to Diesel; Paul Snow; 1961; Whitman.


Clearly, all of the historical explanations about Diesel's disappearance (except the most 'obvious' at the time: suicide) are presented in the book, above. However, some facts are more salient to the young mind than others, and they are therefore retained. 

In fact, Diesel was very well travelled throughout Europe, including the UK ... and through North America. He spoke French, German and English. During his lifetime, the diesel engine was successful in its efficiency in a variety of uses (particularly submarines). There was significant interest in its potential - even before the widespread use of gasoline in 'Otto Cycle' engines, particularly in automobiles. Diesel had lots of potential work with technical consulting, lecturing/teaching, or continuing to develop his invention and make money from its sale.

One of Diesel's initial hopes was that the diesel could provide cheap power across the globe by using waste petroleum or vegetable oils as fuel. (Our modern thinking is constrained about engines and fuels. For example, some of the warplanes of World War One burned castor oil.)

In The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel (2023), Douglas Brunt lays out all the known facts preceding, and at the time of Diesel's disappearance. His speculation on the inventor's possible destinations are quite plausible, given the facts. 

... Once a person has experienced life in other countries, some of them may offer certain attractions and freedoms that your native country does not. And, for some, there can be a certain happiness in newfound anonymity, or at least in being able to leave your past life behind.

Brunt thinks that Winston Churchill - in 1913, Churchill was First Lord of the Admiralty - had a hand in facilitating Rudolf Diesel's disappearance. And it links to the following photo which I had often wondered about in one of my second-hand books ...

from: Canada's Five Centuries; W Kaye Lamb; 1971; McGraw-Hill.

Above:
"Building submarines in Montreal. Twenty-four submarines - the only ones ever built in Canada - were constructed by Canadian Vickers for Britain, Russia, and Spain. When the first of them were delivered, they became the first submarines ever to cross the Atlantic under their own power."


This is an interesting account of the activities which Brunt elaborates on at the end his book.
Additional photos can also be seen at this site.